Monday, 8 October 2012

A Student's View on the Scamblogs

I don't go to the most prestigious law school in New York.  That being said, there are some other students at my school who seem somewhat scared of the 2013 legal job market.  I do not tell fellow students at my law school that I run a scam blog of my own.  Although many of them are scared, it seems that some do not give much thought to the scam blogs.  In other words, while scared, many students are hopeful that they will find something within 9 months of graduation.

I found myself in a conversation with another student about law school.  We did not start by talking about the scamblogs.  However, as time passed, the subject seemed to go that way.

He mentioned having looked at some blogs that were critical of the law schools, and I said I have read them myself.  I asked him which ones he had seen, and he mentioned "a blog with poop".  I wonder what blog that could be.  He mentioned another one, but I forget which it was.  Anyway, I asked him what his thoughts on the blogs were and he said something along the lines of:  "I think they were just failures.  Many of them didn't even try to find a job as a lawyer." 

I didn't know what to say back.  I could have pointed him to JDpainter's blog.  I could have pointed him to JoblessJD or the other blogs.  Surely I think that many of the scambloggers did try to find jobs.  After all, why would a person go to law school for 3 years and then not even try to find work?  It does not make any sense.

I asked him if he was scared of the legal job market.  He said he was, but he knew that he was going to network a lot during his third year and others that he knew at worse off schools had luck doing that.  He also said that the government is a good place to find entry level legal jobs because the government doesn't seem to care about grades as much as some of the big firms.  Also, he doesn't mind working for a low wage of $60k until he can lateral over to a large firm and make "real money." 

It was hard for me not to smile as he talked.  I wish I had that kind of optimism.  He mentioned the bar exam and said that he was more afraid of the bar than looking for a job.  "You know, you just have to eventually find a job.  Everyone eventually finds a job.  It's not like you will be unemployed forever.  Nobody is unemployed forever.  It's like a natural law or something." 

I wished I could have recorded the whole conversation.  He was pretty critical of the scamblogs, and I notice that the sentiment is scared across the board with law students.  Sites like "Top-Law-Schools" are critical of scamblogs.  Most student's don't seem to take them seriously, and others just discount them entirely. 

However, the most negative reactions I see toward the scamblogs is via the internet.  Many people on the internet have this "tough guy" persona.  It's the persona that says, "I am better than everyone else.  I can act like a tough jerk towards others because I have something going for myself."  I notice this kind of mentality a lot with law students.  Many of these "kids" seem to talk big and act large.  Top-Law-Schools was an ego fest in which students advertised how wonderful they were compared to everyone else.  If one had luck of any kind, whether it be getting onto Law Review, getting a big summer internship, or going to a T14, T6, T3, or HYS, they would let the world know.  As if that had something to do with their worth as a human being.  Sadly, I saw many of these individuals treat others like garbage.  Hopefully a few years of them being put in their place by a big law partner will put their ultra-large egos in place.  While it's annoying to see the kids on Top-Law-Schools act like spoiled little s**ts, it's good to know that they will eventually be put in their place.  If anything scares me about working in law, it's working with these entitled individuals.  These people who think that they are better than everyone else because their connections - their daddies, etc. put them into a top law school.  Of course, the way these kids talk, you would think they did it all by themselves.  Just give it a few years.  You'll see what it's really like.

I notice that many "adults" in school are barely that.  Many have little in life experiences.  The things that are talked about in law school classes are often so arbitrary to these kids.  Many have only their perceptions of what "food stamps", "unemployment", "poverty", etc. is like.  Many students only have to reach for the phone when times get hard and call a parent and ask for help.  The reality is, not everyone has that luxury.  And it is a lot of these same kids that think that they are pretty much better than the rest of the world. 

It will be interesting to see where these tough talking "top-law-students" end up.  The same kids that spent hours upon hours bragging to the rest of the world on the internet about how "great" they were to be in a "top 40 school."  The same kids that stroked their own egos in a mental masturbation session about how they made law review and were "GUARANTEED success" by virtue of their high position in the law school.  A big fish in a little pond.  Wait until the real world comes busting through.  Wait until reality beacons.  Everyone gets a wake up call sooner or later.  No one can hang onto pride forever.  Beauty fade, riches wane, intelligence wanes, death waxes near.  Old age eats its way through your entire family, calling you towards the grave as you stand in line waiting in the death line.  You are no better than the rest of us.  You students on your high horses are no greater than the rest of us by virtue of your position in your "higher ranked" law school.  And if your life is so great, why the hell are you sitting on "top-law-schools" forums all day stroking your ego? 

They often say that what others don't like about others is true of what a person does not like about themselves.  It can also be said that those who are the most haughty have the most fear, and the most to lose.  Many of these students who think that they are at the top are going to find themselves falling after graduation comes.  It's not that I want them to fall, it's that they should fall, so their egos are destroyed.  There is nothing worse than seeing a person who accomplished little with an overinflated ego.  If you kids on top-law-schools were so great, so wonderful, you would not need to be on there bragging incessantly.  Your wake up call is coming.  Not because I want it to, not because I said so, but because nature has a way of equalizing things.  Everyone has a high point, and everyone has a low.  Nobody can sustain a lifetime of grandeur that is worth excessive bragging.  And nobody has a right to brag, not until everyone is said and done.

Saturday, 6 October 2012

Robert Morse's Ranking of Higher Educational Institutions

Robert Morse is milking the cash cow that is controlling how the world thinks about higher education.  Are you one of the people who is falling for this unsubstantiated methodology?  If so, you'd better wake up and face reality.  And that reality is that the rankings only are maintaining the status quo in this country of elite vs. non-elite.  Is there really a need to rank every single thing in society?  It's not "complete information," it's "propaganda" at best.  In fact, if you buy into the rankings, as most of the Top-Law-School lemmings do, you had better start considering otherwise.  The truth is, these rankings are filth. Pure and simple.  Possibly one of the worst things that could be done in the realm of higher education.  I say boycott them and ignore them.  They literally serve no purpose whatsoever.
There is a lot of talk about schools being "ranked".  A man by the name of Bob Morse from the elite journal of news, also known as U.S. News and World Report has been ranking colleges for years now.  One wonders the purpose of this endeavor, but having been alive quite a while now, I have come to realize that:

People are OBSESSED with rankings.

Have you noticed that for some reason people have a need to rank every single thing in the world?  I don't really understand the obsession with having to be more elite or have more elite things than others.  When one really gets down to the science of what it means to be alive everyone is equal.  We are all something like a spark in the mind and no more than just a brain.  We have bodies, but those bodies are just vessels.  Yet, as people we are overly obsessed with clothing, possessions, money, prestige, attainment.  And in the end we all die.  What's the point of spending one's entire life in the pursuit of something that doesn't last?  Why do we feel the need to rank everything, and then feel awful if we can't have the best?  Isn't it psychologically degrading to think this way?  Isn't it mentally exhausting to spend one's entire life to search for something that some magazine or outside source says is the best?

Further, I ask myself, and the rest of the world:  Is ranking colleges and universities good?  Or does it just lead to an retention of the status quo?

I think that it's quite silly to rank colleges each year.  First of all, do colleges and universities really change that much in a single year?  I don't think so.  Second, such rankings are psychological in a sense.  People are going to always rank schools like Harvard, Yale, and Stanford higher than other schools.  People's perceptions of those schools are higher, and students who go to those schools think that no matter what, their school is the best, and will rank it accordingly.  As a result, no matter how superior another school may be, these schools will always be near the top.

I have found that since I have started college that I read less and less of the news.  I don't watch television news (I think that it's pretty much a way to control how people think and a way to sell them an idea of what life should be like).  I will not spend money on a news magazine that literally does damage to the fabric of society.  Who cares where one goes to school?  There are idiots that come out of the Ivy league and there are some incredibly intelligent individuals that come out of lesser schools (or who never finish high school for that matter).  To say that someone is more intelligent for going to a school ranked 65 over a school ranked 72 is asinine at best.  Yet, people will still feel superior to others for it, because some news magazine says that they are better for it. 

People are obsessed with numbers.  I have noticed this kind of thinking in law school.  From the moment we apply we are obsessed with our LSAT scores and our GPA in college.  We judge everything based on our class rank, which can get us on Law Review.  We are obsessed with the rankings of the schools as they come out every year.  People literally fill the cesspool known as Top-Law-Schools as the rankings come out, discussing and debating the methodology that goes into the rankings.  People talk about their surprise that Cardozo fell from the top 50 to the top 100.  People cry foul if Stanford rises above Harvard, or if Georgetown is no longer in the top 14.  People literally wrap themselves into these WORTHLESS rankings as if their lives depend on it.

And, yet sadly, employers do take into account these ridiculous numbers.  It affects the job market.  Something so arbitrary can literally have an effect on your career.  Schools become obsessive to try to game the system so that they can have a higher rank and bring in better students.  Yet, should the schools not spend their time and energy into actually making their schools the best places that they can be? 

Some people think that there is nothing wrong with these rankings.  Yet, I say that it's a MASSIVE part of the problem.  A school can easily feel justified in raising its tuition solely because of a high ranking.  That doesn't mean that a low ranked school will not raise its tuition.  For example, New York Law School has an IN$ANE tuition and a lower rank than many schools.  However, schools will make sure to hire the cream of the crop in professors and pay them bank to raise their spot from 67th to a four way tie at 62nd.  And if the school can be in the top 50, hoo boy:  You've got a ca$h cow on your hands.

Is Bob Morse doing us a favor by ranking the schools?  I don't think so.  I literally cringe when I see that "Best Colleges" issue hit the shelves every year.  I literally remember one year I threw up in my mouth upon seeing it.  I believe it comes out in the Spring, and I ask you: DO NOT BUY THAT STUPID MAGAZINE and DO NOT BUY INTO THE RANKINGS.  They are literally worthless.  It is pointless to rank everything in society.  Why not spare the headache and the heartache of crying when you see that your school fell to be in a seven way tie with the school you thought was so much worse than yours?

The rankings only hurt society and maintain the status-quo of elite vs. non-elite.  If higher education truly is a scam, so are these rankings, and they are a huge part of the problem, despite what many others say. 

Friday, 5 October 2012

Where does a doc review monkey get his first banana?


I am preparing for graduation and the job hunt.  In the mean time I thought I would consider doing some big time doc review.  The money isn't too bad, and I am going to need something to get me by and pay the rent. 

Browsing Craigslist has made me break into a sweat as I have noticed that many doc review jobs seem to want people with some doc review experience.  Case in point:

Document Review Project - 2nd Review (Midtown)


Date: 2012-10-04, 6:27PM EDT
Reply to: see below


Strategic Legal Solutions is seeking attorneys for a document review project in midtown beginning early next week. This project will be second review of documents.

Candidates must have prior electronic document review experience and be admitted to the New York Bar.

For consideration, please email your resume, as a Microsoft Word document (no PDF's please), to nycjobs3@strategiclegal.com and kindly include "2nd Review" in the subject line.

We look forward to hearing from you.

---
AND
---

Admitted Attorneys Interested in Doc Review


Date: 2012-10-01, 12:32PM EDT
d5wjv-3308842886@job.craigslist.org [Errors when replying to ads?]


In anticipation of potential document review projects, Tower Legal Solutions is actively recruiting admitted attorneys with at least 3 months of previous document review experience.


Candidates must be admitted to practice, and in good standing, in any US jurisdiction. Strong preference for NY Bar admission.


Qualified candidates should reply to this posting at the address provided, and include an up-to-date resume attached in MS Word format. In the subject line, please put "Admitted Attorney Interested in Doc Reviews". Also please include a brief professional bio in the cover letter.


If you have already registered with us and you would like to update your availability, please email a current resume with "[YOUR NAME] available" in the subject line.

---
AND
---

Document Review Project - Starting this week (Newark)


Date: 2012-10-03, 8:22AM EDT
Reply to: see below


Strategic Legal Solutions is seeking attorneys for a document review project in Newark beginning on Friday, October 5th or Monday, October 8th. This project is expected to last 1-2 months and the rate is $26.00 per hour.

Candidates must have prior document review experience and be admitted to the Bar in any state.

For consideration, please email your resume, as a Microsoft Word document (no PDF's please), to nycjobs2@strategiclegal.com and kindly include "Newark" in the subject line.

We look forward to hearing from you.

---

Where does a future doc review monkey get his first banana?  Maybe I should e-mail and ask, as I am a bit worried that I might not even be qualified to do doc review!

And, on another note, I saw a job for an entry level attorney. 

http://newyork.craigslist.org/que/lgl/3316234914.html

But, he has some terms, some I don't know... are all of these even real?

If you know what these terms mean

MERS [short for mermaids]
Securitization
Foreclosure [when someone finishes with foreplay]
Quiet Title
Bankruptcy
Pond Motion [can't tell if serious]
Lien Avoidance [isn't this where you avoid leaning over your desk when typing a big brief?]

Have a familiarity with these sections of the law:

CPLR §§ 308, 3205, 3211, 3212, 3215, 3408 and others relating to foreclosure

RPAPL §§ 1302, 1303, 1304, 1305 and other relevant sections pertaining to foreclosure

NY Banking Law
US Bankruptcy Code


If you enjoy legal research and converting said knowledge into Pleadings, Motions, Affidavits, Interrogatories, Request for Production, Note of Issue, Bill of Particulars and other legal documents, and have a desire to work in a quick paced environment where you will get real life experience and Court appearances and don't mind working long hours contact us today.


E-Mail Resume to:


info@mynylawfirm.com


---

Will I ever get my banana?


Thursday, 4 October 2012

To the commentor who called me an idiot.

How you see yourself says a lot about how you judge others. True story.

I got a comment on my blog a couple of days ago that I have had some occasion to think about.  I realized I should not bother with "trolls" here, but I figured I would call this person out and let them know that they need to actually sit down and think before they type.

Wow. Not only are you continuing with law school when you KNOW it's a SCAM, you fall for the most obvious "bring truck that's too small and have to make two trips" scam?

And you thanked them for it with a f*cking tip? You are insane.

You are one of life's suckers.

"Here, Dean Scammo, here's another fifty thousand of my dollars for you!"

Idiot.
As you can tell, his reading comprehension level is quite low.  I explained a couple of times why I am continuing with law school.  I don't need to spell it out for him any more.  I figure once you say something enough times and a person doesn't understand it, they are a lost cause. 

I also stated (this person's reading comprehension skills are awful by the way) that I tipped the movers themselves because they did a good job and they are separate from the company.  I am guessing the individual who commented has no idea that workers and employers are often separate entities.  Perhaps the individual has never worked a day in his life.  Perhaps he is still living with his parents.  I am guessing he did not finish law school and/or did awful in it, because the comprehension skills from this "card" are quite low.

There are some people who will make it a game to act like an idiot on the internet.  I am thinking that this individual, this person who thinks that he is so much better than me, is one of these people.  I wish there was something I could do to make this person see that his anger is misdirected.  If you are mad at the law schools, don't take it out on people who are trying to get by.  Don't tell me you have never been scammed (if that was what it was; I don't believe it was an outright scam, but it was annoying nonetheless).

Further, I am going to try to breathe deeply and forget about this whole episode.  I hope that the individual who left the comment above can move on as I am and we can agree to be civil.  If not, you don't need to come back here and comment on what I write.  You can keep your angry thoughts to yourself.  You contributed little to nothing to the conversation.  In fact, you wasted my time.  And yours. 

Paying to get in front of the line, now possibly coming to certain colleges?


In the US, as elsewhere, it is becoming more common to see queues where one can pay to get to the front. It brings the market to the experience of waiting in line - but some say it conflicts with the principles of fairness and equality.
Up until recently, the "serpentine" queue was the norm in America - and businesses were proud to implement them.

"There used to be a bank in New York called Chemical Bank and they used to claim that they were the first ones to have that in their bank lobbies," says Richard Larson, a queuing theorist at MIT. "Wendy's is very proud that they were the first ones in fast food to have the single serpentine line."

The model works because most members of society agree the person who's been waiting longest should be served next, he says.

But today, many Americans are waiting in a new kind of queue - the priority queue, where certain customers get higher priority because they pay.

In American airports, priority queues are now visible everywhere - at the check-in counter, at security and at boarding gates. Many airlines now board their passengers according to the amount of money they've paid for their ticket.

Like Ryanair in Europe, discount airline Spirit is both unpopular and extremely successful. People may moan that they have to pay extra to board first or get a particular seat - but the low prices mean they keep booking tickets.
Priority queues are also being brought in to other areas of American life - from highways to theme parks.

Take the Six Flags White Water amusement park in Atlanta, which implemented a priority queue system in 2011.

Some guests simply queue up for their rides. Those who purchase green-and-gold wrist bands - fitted with radio frequency technology - are able to swim in the pool or eat snacks before being alerted to their turn.

Guests who pay an even higher fee - roughly double the price of admission - get the gold flash pass, cutting their waiting time in half.

The company says it has been a huge hit and is now installing the system in all of its American water parks.

I loved using the flash pass, but when I saw a group of teenage girls glaring at another group of teenage girls all wearing gold wrist bands - I wondered if priority queues were adding to the polarisation in American society, already a hot political issue. Is it really a good idea to further divide citizens into first and second-class citizens?

The priority queuing system has also started to be extended to the public sphere. Many people who drive to Six Flags White Water take Interstate highway I-85.

In October 2011, Atlanta created a priority lane on the highway for drivers with a Peach Pass - the price of driving in the lane changes depending on how much traffic there is.
Critics call them "Lexus lanes", because they claim the lanes benefit only the rich who can afford expensive cars.

Aside from the cost of the express lanes, some drivers are also upset that they replace car pool lanes - special lanes for cars with two or more passengers.

Overnight all the car pool drivers who used to ride free were pushed into the general lanes, making traffic worse for everyone except those who pay.

"I used to be able to drop my daughters off at the bus stop, hop in the car and start my commute. I'd usually arrive at work 35-40 minutes later," says Chris Haley, who blogs at Stop Peach Pass.
"But the very first day this was implemented my commute was an hour and half. It was like that the next day and the next day… it went on for weeks."
He says he cannot afford to spend $120 (£74) extra a month to commute - and he's now had to stop dropping his daughters off.

The Georgia Department of Transportation defends the express lanes - it says they offer a choice to frustrated Atlanta drivers.

Certainly some commuters appreciate them. "I like being able to go around all these crazy people in traffic," says graphic designer Clint Keener.
"To get to work on time, fresh, not stressed out. To me, my time is worth money, my time is worth a dollar. It's as simple as that."

But Georgia state senator Curt Thompson calls them "un-American".

"This is not about improving traffic times. It's just about giving options to people who can afford it.
"What it does is it creates what I call the politics of envy. It separates the haves and the have-nots," he says.

"We've always prided ourselves on not being so stratified. Our founding fathers never had this idea of, 'I got mine, now you go get yours'. That's not anywhere in the constitution, the bill of rights, the declaration of independence. But that's what this creates."
If the use of priority lanes has raised the ire of some of Atlanta's residents, bringing the priority queuing mentality into the American college system has proved even more controversial.
California's community colleges have provided generations of low-income students access to higher education. However, budget cuts have forced some colleges to reduce the number of classes they offer - and getting a seat can be tricky.

At Santa Monica College in California I saw students sitting on the floor and standing in the hall hoping to get a coveted seat in one of the over-subscribed classes.
"Our classes are basically completely filled, they're 100% full. And it's maddening for us because we pride ourselves on access," says college president Chui Tsang.

Desperate to widen access, last spring he came up with a programme he called Advance Your Dreams.

Tsang's plan would enable students to pay up to 400% more for a guaranteed seat in a class, and the money generated would have allowed extra classes to be arranged.
"It's like a Robin Hood system," he says. "Those who can afford it can pay a little higher and the excess revenues can help subsidise those who cannot afford the same price."

But not all students were convinced. Student president Harrison Wills says the proposal discriminates against poorer students.

"What you're going to have is a competing group of people applying for the cheapest classes and then those that don't get it, those who can afford it will go to the second tier," he says.
Those who could not afford it would have to wait and try to get on the course again at a later date.
Disquiet over the Advance Your Dreams programme led to a protest at a meeting of the school's trustees, which span out of control, leading campus police to pepper-spray a number of students.
The California chancellor of education then requested that the college put the controversial programme on hold. Tsang has not given up though, and hopes to reintroduce it at a later date. He says he is still baffled by the outcry.

"Freedom of choice is a fundamental right that we have in the United States," he says.
"And in this system when you tell someone that, 'Yeah, you have money but I cannot allow you to make a free choice because it's not fair,' that's insane."

Americans have a deep-rooted belief in the market and since priority queues can generate revenue it's no surprise that they are turning up in the public sector as well.

But are traditional American values like fairness and equal opportunity really compatible with letting someone buy their way to the front of the line? And what happens when the people who pay more want more?

Source: BBC News

Wednesday, 3 October 2012

The California School of Law

I keep getting this e-mail... It seems that a law school in California known as the California School of Law is interested in me attending their law school.  However, the school has yet to be accredited (its an online school).  However, tuition here is a lot cheaper than most schools.  I imagine this is a decent school IF you are going to go hang a shingle after law school or if you are well connected, i.e., daddy has a firm and you just need a degree.  This kind of discount degree might have worked for some people who instead opted to pay over $100,000 for a law degree.  After all, you can still have the J.D. "badge of honor" on your resume. 

Anyway, I am sure some of you get this e-mail.  I get it every couple of months. 

---

To help assist in your decision making process, please review answers
to Frequently Asked Questions by Prospective Students to the
California School of Law provided below. If you have any remaining
questions or would like clarification as to any of the information
provided below, please call our admissions office to speak to a
counselor at 805-683-5337 or 866-970-4LAW.

**Frequently Asked Questions by Prospective Students to the California
School of Law**

** How does the California School of Law's on-line Law School work? **

The goal of the California School of Law is to provide an online
educational experience as close to a traditional residential law
school as possible.

Students can see and speak with the professors and classmates by
logging into a Virtual Classroom from a computer at home or work. In
real-time, classes are conducted just like at a traditional "brick and
mortar" law school therefore the professor will take attendance,
discuss cases, directly question students, and give students the
opportunity to discuss and debate the law with their classmates.
Students have an opportunity to have face to face interaction with
other students thereby establishing friendships and professional
networking connections
.

[But, at least the other students can't see me blush when I get the answers wrong].

**What degree do I receive when I graduate?**

Every student who graduates from the California School of Law will
receive a Juris Doctor degree, opening up a world of employment
opportunities, as an attorney, law professor, business person, or
wherever you imagine your career is taking you.


** What time do the classes meet?**

Classes meet every Tuesday and Thursday evening for 4 years.


[Wait, no Monday or Wednesday classes?  No Fridays?]

** How long is a semester?**

The California School of Law runs on trimesters, following a
traditional 15 week/4 month law school semester.

**When is the next semester start?**

The next semester begins in November 27 , 2012. *Please note that
exact dates are subject to change. For the most current schedule,
always refer to our Course Calendar, on our website at:
http://www.californiaschooloflaw.com/calendar-2.html

**When is the application deadline for the fall start?

**

 November 4, 2012. Here is the app link;
http://www.californiaschooloflaw.com/electronic-forms.html

**How long does it take to complete the JD program?**

The program takes 4 years to complete (sorry it cannot be
accelerated).

**What is the tuition?**

Tuition is charged by the semester.

 * One Semester $2,500.00 * One year or Three Trimesters $7,500.00 * 4 year Juris Doctor Degree $30,000.00

**Does California School of Law provide tuition assistance?**

California School of Law provides students with several affordable and
attractive installment plans. All plans require some payment while
attending law school. All students enrolled in the California School
of Law will be approved for a installment plan. Tuition is charged by
the semester, not the year, keeping both the principal and interest
low.

**Can I observe a law school class in session?**

We welcome prospective students interested in observing a law school
class in session. To make arrangements, please contact Admissions at
805-683-5337 or 866-970-4LAW, or reach us by e-mail at:
admissions@californiaschooloflaw.com

**How do I take exams and submit homework?

**

 Professors can post exams or homework assignments in the virtual
classes, students then type up their answers and up load the work just
like you do for an e-mail attachment. Professors can post grades and
any comments on the exam or homework. No proctor is required.

**What if a student has a computer problem during class?**

Tech support is readily available for students who experience
technical problems. However, once students are familiar with
California School of Law's software programs, they generally have few
technical problems.

**What exams do I have to take to become an attorney?**

For a Juris Doctor degree, students must take and pass the California
First-Year Law Students Examination (FYLSE or "baby bar") and the
California Bar Exam and/or a state bar exam in a state that admits our
graduates.

Students from the California School of Law have done exceptionally
well on the First Year Law Students' Exam that is required by the
California State Bar. In June, 2010, 75% of the law Schools' "First
Time Takers" passed, and in June, 2009, 100% of the law Schools'
"First Time Takers" passed.

**Who will teach the classes?**

All classes are taught by experienced faculty, who are all licensed
attorneys and experts in their field, to find out more go to:
http://www.californiaschooloflaw.com/index.php?page=faculty

**How do students and professors communicate?**

Professors and students meet live in virtual classes scheduled twice a
week, to discuss and debate the law.
Office hours are usually
scheduled before or after class depending on availability. Faculty
e-mail addresses are also provided.

** How do I get my Textbooks? **

The California School of Law uses the same textbooks regularly used at
prestigious law schools nationwide.
The textbooks are available
on-line. Students can also buy a paper textbooks online or in a local
law school bookstore. A complete list of our casebooks is available on
our website at the Student Store link.

[Same ones used at Harvard, Yale, Columbia, Touro, Stanford and other elite schools]

** What about California School of Law library services?**

A Westlaw account is provided to all students. Westlaw is a virtual
library and database used by most attorneys and large law firms. With
Westlaw, students learn how to conduct legal research and have access
to the most recent cases, statutes, and journal articles from around
the country.


[What about Lexis?]

** Can students work full time while enrolled in law school? **

Yes. Most of our students work full time and schedule their free time
around studying and their evening classes.

** What approval does the California School of Law have? **

California State Bar:

California School of Law is registered with The Committee of Bar
Examiners of the State Bar of California as a Distance-Learning Law
School.

In April 2009, the Committee of Bar Examiners of the State Bar of
California performed a complete on-site inspection of the California
School of Law, including our corporate offices, student and business
records, education technology and faculty. The Committee of Bar
Examiners has approved the California School of Law’s registration
as a Distance Learning Law School.

American Bar Association:

To date, the American Bar Association (“ABA”) has not accredited
any online law school.
Thus, the California School of Law is not
accredited by the American Bar Association.

**How do I Apply?

**

 The next semester at the California School of Law begins November 27,
2012. The application deadline is November 4, 2012. To begin the
application process, go to

 http://www.californiaschooloflaw.com/electronic-forms.html

Tuesday, 2 October 2012

Moving Woes...

I am sorry that I have not posted here lately.  I have been moving and setting up my new apartment.  Overall, I am really excited to have moved.  My place is a lot smaller, but it is cheaper and it has a lot of nice touches (separate entrance, decorative fireplace, dishwasher, new appliances, big bay windows, lots of light, brownstone building).  It has a big kitchen (especially for Manhattan) and a full bathroom with tub and a large living room with alcove.  The price wasn't bad at all, either.  In fact, I knew when I saw this place I had to have it.  Compared to everywhere else, it was a steal.  Further, it's only a few blocks from the subway and a block from a really nice park.

Sadly, I ran into some internet trouble when moving.  I told my ISP that I was moving on Sunday and to change the internet then.  However, while I was watching the X Files on Netflix on Friday afternoon I noticed my internet stopped working.  I called the ISP and told them that I was moving on Sunday and they said that they had just turned off my internet service.  I asked if they could turn it back on and they said they would need to have someone come out there to turn it on. 

So, get this, they can turn OFF my internet from their location but they can not turn it back ON?  Doesn't that seem a bit strange?  Well, I had to wait until Monday afternoon to get my internet back up and running.  That meant no blogging, no playing Mists of Pandaria... nothing.  I could check my e-mail on my pay as you go phone, but that experience left me mostly annoyed. 

But, now I am back and exhausted after the move.  I hired some movers to help out and the truck they brought was a 10 foot when they said they would bring a 14 foot.  Well, everything but a futon and a desk fit (it would have fit in the 14 foot they had told me).  And although the rate was set at $250 flat for the move, since they had to make an extra trip, it ended up costing me $560 + tip!  The movers themselves (big burly muscle men) were nice and worthy of a tip, but the company really slipped up.  I guess that's life.  What else could have I done about it? 
Girls Generation - Korean